Health clinics serving Native Americans in cities grapple with limited funding, scarce resources
By Julia Shapero and Michael Korsh
WASHINGTON — Health-care organizations that support Native Americans living in urban areas receive minimal federal funding, even though more than 70 percent of the U.S. Native population lives in metropolitan areas.
The 41 Indian health organizations serving them, which the federal government calls Urban Indian Organizations or UIOs, receive only about 1% of the federal funding provided to the Indian Health Service. In the fiscal 2022 omnibus appropriations bill signed by President Joseph Biden in March, the IHS received about $6.6 billion. Indian health organizations in urban areas received about $73 million of that.
However, organizations that represent Native people living in cities emphasized that their need for more funding should not be used as a reason to take funding away from the rest of the Native health care system, which is underfunded itself. Rather, they said, Congress should increase funding to urban health-care facilities, as well as to other parts of the Indian Health Service.
An historically underfunded system
The Indian Health Service, a federal agency within the Department of Health and Human Services, provides health-care services to Native people who are members of the 574 federally recognized tribes.
The federal government is responsible for providing the Native population with health care under its treaties with tribes, in which tribal leaders agreed to give up land in return for the government’s promise to provide health care, education, and other services.
The Indian Health Service provides health services through its own facilities, tribal facilities, and 41 Urban Indian Organizations. While IHS and tribal facilities typically serve Native people living on reservations, other Indian health organizations explicitly serve urban areas.
Despite being responsible for the health care of about 2.6 million people, the Indian Health Service has been significantly underfunded since its inception in 1955, according to Francys Crevier, chief executive officer of the National Council of Urban Indian Health.
The federal aid for the system works out to about one-third of the national average of health-care spending per patient, Crevier said: Where U.S. health-care spending reached $11,172 per person in 2018, the Indian Health Service received $4,078 per patient, and Urban Indian Organizations got $672. She added that the Indian Health Service is currently funded at 12% of its need.
“There’s a trust obligation to make sure that we’re taken care of, but we’re not funded at all to be able to do so,” she said.
Before the 1950s, most Native Americans lived on reservations or in nearby towns, as well as in tribal jurisdictional areas, such as parts of Oklahoma. But federal policies throughout the 20th century pushed many Native Americans off reservations and into urban centers.
With the passage of House Concurrent Resolution 108 in 1953, Congress sought to end its legal obligations to tribes and terminate their status as federally recognized tribes — a policy known as termination. More than 100 tribes were terminated under the policy.
The Indian Relocation Act of 1956 went hand-in-hand with the termination policy, encouraging Native Americans to move to cities for job opportunities. Between 1950 and 1980, about 750,000 Native Americans left reservations for urban areas.
“The government was trying to entice Native people to voluntarily leave the reservation for city life, and they did this through promises,” said Patty Loew, former director of the Center for Native American and Indigenous Research at Northwestern University. “Often what they got was a one-way bus ticket.”
“A political football”
Despite serving a significant proportion of the Native population, Indian Health Service supported health providers face significant obstacles to acquiring more funding from Congress. The IHS is the only federal health system whose budget has to be approved by Congress each year, said Meredith Raimondi, vice president of public policy at the National Council of Urban Indian Health.
“Because of that, it becomes a political football,” she said.
The 2022 omnibus appropriations bill included a 6 percent increase in funding for the IHS and 17 percent more for Indian organizations in urban areas. This was the largest increase in the urban organizations’ funding in 10 years, Raimondi said.
While she sees that as a positive move, she said there had been a sense that Congress would do more in light of the pandemic. COVID-19 hit the Native population particularly hard, with higher rates of cases, hospitalizations, and deaths than the general U.S. population.
“It seemed like the president was listening; it seemed like the Senate was listening; it seemed like the House was interested in this. And then when push came to shove, at the end of the day, it fell through the cracks,” she said.
“This is something that flies in the face of the talk that political leaders are having,” she added. “Which is that they want to help Indian Country, and they want to honor the trust responsibility, and they want to make the Indian Health System better.”
Seven in 10 Native Americans live in urban areas and face health inequities that were exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic.
The challenges faced by urban-dwelling American Indians largely mirror those faced by those living on reservations—limited and substandard housing, high unemployment, inadequate job training and severe poverty. However, the urban environment exacerbates these challenges in many cases.
During the pandemic, Native Americans on reservations have had high rates of vaccination, while urban dwellers did not have the same easy access to vaccines.
A team of 20 Medill School of Journalism students from the Washington program reported on the health care problems of urban American Indians, focusing on Chicago, Minneapolis and Milwaukee, and also on some solutions they have created.
Published in conjunction with